Lo sentimos. Esta página sólo está disponible en el idioma que está viendo actualmente.

Sorry. This page is only available in the language you are currently viewing.

Cerrar | Close

Share this page:

The Janus case is a call to arms for unions

Interview by Dr. María de Jesús Estrada  |  Issue: April | May 2018

Interview with President Tony Johnston, Cook County College Teachers Union

Background Information:

On Monday, February 26, the Supreme Court heard the Janus vs. AFSCME. Mark Janus sued AFSCME claiming that unions did not represent his political interests and that payment of Fair Share dues is a violation of free speech.

The bill is supported by the National Right to Work Foundation and the Liberty Justice Center and billionaires like Illinois governor Bruce Rauner. The ruling would give a decisive blow to public-sector unions. Yet, the case is galvanizing unions to organize and re-examine how they can make unions even more relevant to workers.

In Chicago and suburban community colleges, the CCCTU has guaranteed decent wages and benefits for faculty, professionals, adjuncts, and para-professionals alike and excellent education for students. A post-Janus world could negatively impact students and the community.

Interview done by Dr. María de Jesús Estrada

Give us a little bit of background on Janus. Who is behind this attack on public-sector unions?

Right-wing conservative groups have funded the Right to Freeload legislation and litigation. This article gives a very concise explanation of the forces behind Janus:

http://inthesetimes.com/features/janus_supreme_court_unions_investigation.html

What is the state of Janus given the Supreme Court hearing?

As has been predicted, it looks certain that the Supreme Court will vote to overturn the Abood decision which will make fair share dues deduction unconstitutional. This ruling will allow any union member from public-sector unions to opt out of membership and dues deduction at any time.

How should unions respond to these attacks on public-sector workers?

This decision gives us an opportunity to have a real conversation with our members on the real benefits of being in a union.

Why should non-union members care about these attacks?

There is a lot of data which shows that benefits and improvements won by unions translate into increases in salaries and benefits for non-union workers. Also, this challenge provides us in the labor movement an opportunity to reach out to workers who are not unionized and organize them.

A lot of organizers have been addressing the issue of unity. How can unions unite with other social movements?

It is vital that unions reach out to community-based organizations and civic groups such as Black Lives Matter so that people see unions as advocating not just for salaries and working conditions, but for issues that have a real impact on the communities that we serve.

Do you have any final thoughts regarding Janus?

Janus is a call to arms for unions. It has forced us to get back to our real job of improving the lives of our members and showing them that our actions in the workplace will lead to a more equal and just society.

Deje Su Comentario | Leave a Comment

* Requerido | Required
- Su Correo Electrónico no sera publicado. | Your Email will not be published.

Please Download PDF Mail-In Donation Form